Specificity in Induced Plant Responses Shapes Patterns of Herbivore Occurrence on Solanum dulcamara Author(s): Danush V. Viswanathan, Anita J. T. Narwani, Jennifer S. Thaler Source: Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 4 (Apr., 2005), pp. 886-896 Published by: Ecological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3450842 Accessed: 05/11/2008 19:17 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=esa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecology. http://www.jstor.org Ecology, 86(4), 2005, pp. 886-896 ? 2005 by the Ecological Society of America SPECIFICITY IN INDUCED PLANT RESPONSES SHAPES PATTERNS OF HERBIVORE OCCURRENCE ON SOLANUM DULCAMARA DANUSH V. VISWANATHAN,' ANITA J. T. NARWANI, AND JENNIFER S. THALER2 Departmentof Botany, Universityof Toronto,25 WillcocksStreet, TorontoM5S 3B2, Canada Abstract. Interspecific competition between phytophagous insects can occur when plant responses induced by an early-season herbivore alter host quality for later colonizers. Recent evidence for specificity in the elicitation of induced plant responses by different attackers suggests that dynamics of host use in the field may be more complex than previously anticipated, because host suitability for colonizing herbivores may depend on which herbivore species has initially damaged a plant. In each of two years, we manipulated the first herbivore to attack Solanum dulcamara plants in an experimental population using several different arthropod species and subsequently monitored colonization by natural herbivores over the course of the growing season. We additionally performed weekly herbivore counts in wild S. dulcamara populations following natural variation in herbivore arrival. Plantmediated interactions occurred primarily between two leaf-feeding beetles, Psylliodes affinis and Plagiometriona clavata. In both manipulative and observational experiments, P. clavata oviposition was reduced on plants initially damaged by P. affinis (or a third leaf-feeding beetle, Lema trilinea) relative to plants that were initially undamaged. Lowered P. clavata occurrence continued through subsequent life-history stages, resulting in decreased emergence of second-generation P. clavata adults on these plants. The occurrence of P. affinis was also lowered on plants damaged by conspecifics in both manipulative and observational experiments. Resistance against P. affinis also followed applications of jasmonic acid, an elicitor of plant defensive responses. Conversely, early-season damage by P. clavata did not influence plant quality for either later conspecifics or P. affinis. Initial herbivory by the spittlebug Aphrophora saratogensis or generalist taildropper slugs (Prophysaon sp.) likewise had no influence on P. clavata and P. affinis colonization, whereas L. trilinea damage did not affect later arriving P. affinis. Hence, only a subset of early-season damagers influenced herbivore occurrence on S. dulcamara. Preference tests examining P. affinis feeding and P. clavata oviposition confirmed that specificity in elicitation of induced plant responses produced the divergent herbivore occurrence patterns observed in the field. Overall, the existence of plant-mediated competitive asymmetry between herbivore species on S. dulcamara highlights the dynamic nature of plant resistance and its potential role in organizing herbivore communities. Key words: bittersweetnightshade;competition;herbivory;induced responses;phytophagous insect communities;Plagiometrionaclavata;plant-mediatedinteractions;Psylliodes affinis;Solanum dulcamara;specificity. INTRODUCTION Increasingly widespread documentation of induced plant responses to herbivory has fostered interest in the possibility of plant-mediated interactions between different herbivores (Faeth 1986, Denno et al. 1995). Such indirect effects may occur when physical or chemical plant responses induced by a given herbivore affect resource quality for subsequent foragers (Karban and Baldwin 1997). Indeed, a review by Denno et al. (1995) found that induced responses were involved in over half of the published studies in which competition occurred between mandibulate herbivores. More recent received13 February 2004;revised15 June2004; Manuscript Editor:K. C. Larson. accepted23 August2004. Corresponding I E-mail:danush@ botany.utoronto.ca 2 Present address: Departmentof Entomology, Cornell University, 3128 Comstock Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA. work has begun to extend these results to other feeding guilds (Denno et al. 2000), and further suggests that induced responses may play a part in structuring herbivore communities (Tscharntke 1999, Gonzalez-Megias and Gomez 2003, Van Zandt and Agrawal 2004). Plant-mediated interactions between herbivore species are therefore emerging as an important mechanism of competition in many systems. To date, however, most experimental field studies have examined only whether a single early-season inducing agent can influence later foragers (e.g., Haukioja and Niemela 1979, Faeth 1986, Hanhimaki 1989, Karban 1993, Thaler et al. 2001, Wise and Weinberg 2002). This approach mimics natural conditions in systems where a particular species is the exclusive or predominant earlyseason damager. In many systems, however, several different herbivore taxa feed abundantly on a common host plant species during its early growth phase. The 886 SPECIFICITYOF PLANT RESPONSES April2005 dynamics of host use over a growing season may be substantially more complex than previously expected if the host plant exhibits specificity in induced responses to different early-season attackers. Specificity in plant response has two components: effect and elicitation. Specificity of effect occurs when herbivore species are differently affected by a given induced response (Stout et al. 1998, Agrawal 2000; see also Hartley and Lawton 1987). Experiments assessing colonization of treated and untreated plants by natural assemblages of herbivores following early-season induction frequently find some degree of specificity of effect (e.g., Hunter 1987, Inbar et al. 1998, Agrawal 1999, Agrawal and Sherriffs 2001, Thaler et al. 2001, Riihimaki et al. 2003). Conversely, specificity of elicitation occurs when herbivore species differentially induce phenotypic responses in a particular host plant (Stout et al. 1994, 1998, Agrawal 2000, Traw and Dawson 2002). In the field, specificity of elicitation is evident when a given attacker varies in abundance across plants initially damaged by different herbivore species. Using lab preference tests, Hartley and Lawton (1987) revealed specificity of elicitation in field-collected birch leaves damaged by different herbivores. Additionally, Inbar et al. (1998) showed that different chemical elicitors of induced plant responses varied in their ability to influence the colonization of tomato plants by specific herbivores. Otherwise, however, field colonization of plants treated with different damage types has been explicitly compared only between plants with herbivore vs. mechanical damage (e.g., Agrawal 1999, Agrawal and Sherriffs 2001; but see Van Zandt and Agrawal 2004). In this paper, we present two years of field data from manipulative experiments examining whether the identity of the initial attacker on Solanum dulcamara plants can influence patterns of colonization by subsequent foragers. Regular counts of herbivore abundance on plants over the growing season enabled us to assess the duration and strength of specific, plant-mediated interactions between different herbivores. We also used early- through late-season damage estimates to distinguish between the direct effects of initial damage per se on later colonization and the indirect effects of early damage type mediated through differences in subsequent levels of herbivory. We additionally performed weekly herbivore counts in wild S. dulcamara populations following natural variation in herbivore arrival to determine whether similar patterns occur in natural conditions. Finally, we conducted preference tests using a subset of treatments from manipulative experiments to expressly investigate specificity in the elicitation of induced plant responses as the mechanism underlying results from the field. METHODS Study system Solanum dulcamara L. (bittersweet nightshade) is a perennial vine in the Solanaceae that has been shown 887 ? PLATE. 1. '4 Plagiometriona clavata (tortoise beetle) adult feeding on Solanumdulcamara(bittersweetnightshade)leaf. Photo credit:D. Viswanathan. to induce pathogenesis-related proteins, peroxidases, polyphenol oxidases, and cell necrosis in response to herbivory by gall mites (Bronner et al. 199 la, b). These responses reduce intraspecific gall mite damage to the plant (Westphal et al. 1991), exert negative interspecific effects on rust mite fecundity (Westphal et al. 1991), and positive interspecific effects on spider mite fecundity (Westphal et al. 1992). Additionally, herbivory by Lema trilinea (three-lined potato beetle) induces changes in polyphenol oxidase and proteinase inhibitor activity, which can influence the growth rate of L. trilinea larvae (Viswanathan and Thaler 2004). Natural populations of S. dulcamara occur at the Koffler Scientific Reserve at Jokers Hill (hereafter Jokers Hill), King City, Ontario, Canada, where all field experiments were conducted. Several herbivore species feed on S. dulcamara at Jokers Hill, five of which were examined in this study: two univoltine native specialists on solanaceous plants, Lema trilinea White and Plagiometriona clavata Fab. (tortoise beetle; see Plate 1); an introduced univoltine solanaceous specialist, Psylliodes affinis Paykull (European potato flea beetle); Aphrophora saratogensis Fitch (Saratoga spittlebug), a native that feeds on understory herbs as a nymph in the spring and later specializes on pine trees as an adult froghopper; and native generalist taildropper slugs (Prophysaon sp.). Manipulative experiments Manipulative experiments using transplants of S. dulcamara were conducted in June-August of both 2001 and 2002 (n = 400 and 500, respectively). Seeds had been collected previously from wild S. dulcamara populations at Jokers Hill, and seedlings were grown in ProMixBX soil (Premier Horticulture, Riviere-duLoup, Qu6bec, Canada) contained in 131-mL pots under a 16:8 L:D greenhouse cycle for three weeks prior to transplantation. Both manipulative experiments were conducted in the semi-shaded understory of a young forest where S. dulcamara occurs naturally, with transplants spaced -30 cm apart in a square grid. Following transplantation, each plant was protected from ambient herbivores with a spun polyester sleeve 888 DANUSH V. VISWANATHANET AL. (Rockingham Opportunities Corporation, Reidsville, North Carolina, USA) and was allowed to acclimate to field conditions for a week. In 2001, eight different treatments were then randomly imposed, with 50 replicates of each treatment. Five treatments consisted of inoculations with either adult L. trilinea, P. clavata, P. affinis, Prophysaon sp., or A. saratogenis nymphs. The remaining three treatments included a I-mL spray of a 0.5 mmol jasmonic acid (an elicitor of plant defensive responses) solubilized in 1%acetone solution (see Thaler et al. [1996] for dosage), and two controls (plants undamaged and sprayed with a control solution of water and 1% acetone, or plants mechanically damaged with a hole punch to produce leaf loss without specific induction cues). In 2002, the experiment was repeated at an adjacent site without the A. saratogensis and mechanical damage treatments, resulting in -92 replicates for each of the remaining six treatments. Over a one-week initial damaging phase, the amount of tissue consumed was equalized at 15-20% across leaf-feeding herbivore treatments using herbivore additions and removals. ANOVA results compared damage measurements using an acetate grid on a subset of 20 plants from each treatment (for 2001, F495 = 0.71, P = 0.56; for 2002, F376 = 0.08, P = 0.97). Equal- ization of tissue removal was used to prevent dosedependent differences between treatments in induced responses. On average, 2-4 herbivores per plant were required to produce this level of herbivory. For the A. saratogensis treatment, four individuals were placed on each plant, which was sufficient to cause wilting in 10% of replicates. After one week, -15% leaf tissue was removed per plant in the mechanical damage treatment, and the jasmonic acid treatment was applied. After the treatments had been imposed, all sleeves and treatment herbivores were removed. Colonization by naturally occurring herbivores was then assessed through regular counts of the abundance and identity of all aboveground herbivores on each plant. Because herbivore colonization may be influenced by plant size, plant height was recorded at each sampling interval in both years, along with the number of leaves in 2002. In both years, visual estimates of total percentage damage were also recorded, because colonizing herbivores may be sensitive to differences between treatments in levels of herbivory following initial damage. In 2001, plants were sampled weekly throughout June, and subsequently every second week until mid-August, for a total of seven sampling dates. In 2002, plants were sampled every 10 days, with three sampling dates in each of June, July, and August. Observational study In May-August of 2002, observational studies were conducted at Jokers Hill in two populations of S. dulcamara. Site 1 consisted of 200 second-year seedlings, transplanted into an open forest understory in the previous year. Site 2 consisted of a large natural S. dul- Ecology,Vol. 86, No. 4 camara population occurring in a pine stand, where 100 ramets were randomly selected for use in the study. Ramets occurred in clumps spaced 0.5-3 m apart, with clumps varying in size from 10 to 50 ramets. Only one ramet was selected per clump to reduce the probability of sampling within a genet. Selected ramets varied in size from 20 to 100 cm, measured from their point of connection with other ramets, and were sampled over this entire length. At the end of May, when S. dulcamara herbivores were first appearing, the species that had first attacked each seedling or ramet was assessed; S. dulcamara herbivores generally have a characteristic pattern of damage that can be used to identify early-season attackers when levels of damage are relatively low. A number of plants were still undamaged at this point. Plant height, number of leaves, and visual estimates of percentage tissue removed were also recorded on the initial sampling date. At weekly intervals for the next two months, these three variables, as well as herbivore abundance and identity, were measured on each plant. Preference tests In 2003, P. affinis feeding and P. clavata oviposition preference tests were conducted using potted plants, because these two herbivores discriminated between treatments in field experiments (see Results). For these tests, plants were grown in the greenhouse for three weeks as previously described, after which experimental treatments were imposed. A no-choice feeding assay was used to examine the absolute preference of P. affinis for different induced plant phenotypes. For this assay, four treatments were randomly assigned across 44 plants: control, or herbivory by adult L. trilinea, P. clavata, or P. affinis. Each plant was covered with a spun polyester sleeve, and the amount of tissue consumed across herbivore treatments was equalized at 15-20% using herbivore additions and removals, as per the manipulative experiments. Following a one-week damaging phase, all herbivores and sleeves were removed. After a subsequent week of growth, a sleeve was used to enclose the bottom (damaged) portion of each plant, while a second larger sleeve was used to contain the entire plant. Single P. affinis adults were placed in each large sleeve, and the leaf area consumed was recorded after two days, along with available leaf area and total plant height. Because assay herbivores did not have access to damaged portions of the plant, we interpret differences in feeding between treatments to indicate specificity in the elicitation of induced plant responses. A choice assay was used to examine the oviposition preference of P. clavata females for different induced phenotypes relative to uninduced plants. A choice assay was used instead of a no-choice assay because P. clavata females seem to oviposit on low-quality plants when higher quality resources are not available (D. V. Viswanathan and J. S. Thaler, unpublished data). Two April2005 889 SPECIFICITYOF PLANT RESPONSES trials of the P. clavata oviposition choice assay were conducted, using 82 and 64 plants, respectively. For each trial, half of the plants were left as undamaged controls. Every control plant was paired with another plant assigned to one of three treatments: adult L. trilinea, P. clavata, or P. affinis herbivory. All four treatments were imposed as previously described. After a week of growth following the initial damage phase, the bottom (damaged) portion of each plant was covered with a sleeve. Each pair of damaged-control plants was then enclosed together in a larger sleeve. A single gravid P. clavata female was placed in every large sleeve, and the differences between the two plants in eggs laid, available leaf area, and total plant height were calculated after four days. Each damaged-control pair served as a replicate, with 41 and 32 in each trial, respectively. As with the P. affinis feeding test, bioassay P. clavata did not have access to damaged portions of the plant. Hence, we likewise interpret differences in relative oviposition across the different treatment-control combinations to indicate differences in plant quality induced by initial herbivory. Data and statistical analyses Across all field experiments, L. trilinea, P. clavata, P. affinis, and several slug species colonized the plants. However, only P. clavata and P. affinis occurred at high enough frequencies to perform statistical analyses. For P. clavata, overwintering adults oviposit on S. dulcamara leaves over 3-4 weeks in early summer, with the entire juvenile stage subsequently being completed on leaf surfaces. Hence, we were able to record all life stages for this species: adults, eggs, larvae, pupae, and exuviae (the presence of a pupal molt can be used to infer successful eclosion; D. V. Viswanathan, personal observation). P. affinis larvae feed on roots, so only the occurrence of adults could be scored for this species. Herbivore occurrence data were not normally distributed; there were many zero and one values. Dichotomous, binomially distributed data are analyzed using logistic regression, which can be generalized for polychotomous dependent variables with a multinomial distribution (Trexler and Travis 1993). Hence, generalized estimating equations were used to perform repeatedmeasures poisson regressions on herbivore counts (GEE-PROC GENMOD in SAS System Version 8; Allison 1999). Poisson regression calculates likelihoodratio chi-square statistics, with degrees of freedom equal to one minus the number of levels of each factor. It also produces an odds ratio for each level of every factor adjusted for other terms in the model, indicating the odds (or likelihood) that the response will occur. The odds ratio for each level is calculated relative to a reference level, with a value of one indicating an equal likelihood of the event taking place. Values above or below one indicate greater or lesser odds, respectively, when compared to the reference level. In the current study, repeated-measures Poisson regressions were used to compare the relative odds of herbivore occurrence across treatments over several weeks. If there was a significant week by treatment interaction in the repeated-measures analysis, individual weeks were also examined separately. When the effect across individual weeks was similar, only the repeated-measures analysis were reported. In the observational study, treatments were classified by which herbivore species had first damaged a plant, with undamaged plants as "controls." At each observational site, the number of plants damaged by different herbivore species, or initially undamaged, was similar. Plant height and leaf number were used as covariates, because these variables may additionally influence herbivore foraging choice. In the observational study, the amount of damage imposed by initial damagers was used as a covariate for similar reasons. Covariates that were not significant were removed from the analysis. Initial damage type may directly influence later herbivore occurrence, or may act indirectly through differences in subsequent levels of herbivory. Hence, we also used damage estimates from each previous sampling interval as a covariate to distinguish between direct and indirect effects of initial damage type. Poisson regressions were performed with and without the damage estimate covariate. If inclusion of damage levels from the previous week eliminated a significant main effect of treatment, we conclude that effects on herbivore occurrence resulted from differences between treatments in levels of damage following initial herbivory, and not directly from lasting effects of initial damage type per se (cf. Van Zandt and Agrawal 2004). For the P. affinis no-choice preference test, leaf area consumed was analyzed using a one-factor ANOVA, with damage type as the main effect and available leaf area and total plant height as covariates. For the P. clavata choice preference test, the difference in number of eggs laid between damaged and control plants was analyzed using a two-factor ANOVA, with damage type and trial as the main effects and differences in both available leaf area and total plant height as covariates. Significant ANOVA results were further examined using Tukey post hoc comparisons. RESULTS Manipulative experiments For both 2001 and 2002, the repeated-measures analysis revealed a significant week by treatment interaction on the odds of Psylliodes affinis occurrence (Table 1). For the 2001 data, examination of individual sampling dates revealed that initial treatment had a significant effect only in the second week after initial damage (X2= 47.7, df = 7, P < 0.001). Similarly, treatment in 2002 had a significant effect only one week following initial damage (X2 = 68.7, df = 5, P < 0.001). The effect of each specific treatment was consistent across 890 DANUSH V. VISWANATHANET AL. TABLE 1. Results from repeated-measuresPoisson regres- Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 4 stages. There were strong effects of initial treatment sions examiningthe occurrenceof Psylliodesaffinisadults P. clavata oviposition in 2002 (Table 1; egg number on and Plagiometrionaclavata eggs on Solanumdulcamara was not recorded in 2001). Both Lema trilinea and P. plants following differentearly-seasondamagetypes. affinis damage decreased the odds of P. clavata oviP df Effect X2 position by -50% relative to undamaged controls, with no influence of Prophysaon or mechanical damage adults a) Psylliodes affinis (Fig. lb; see the Appendix for raw means). AdditionManipulativeexperiment2001 7 0.28 8.6 Treatment ally, the occurrence of P. clavata larvae was signifi5 <0.001 88.7 Week cantly affected by initial treatment in both years (for 35 <0.001 75.8 Treatmentx Week 2001, x2 = 16.1, df = 7, P = 0.02; for 2002, x2 = 1 <0.001 12.4 Percentagedamage 28.45, df = 5, P < 0.001). As with egg numbers, odds Manipulativeexperiment2002 of occurrence for P. clavata larvae were -50% lower 5 0.004 17.3 Treatment <0.001 6 159.9 Week on L. trilinea and P. affinis damaged plants relative to 74 30 <0.001 Treatmentx Week undamaged controls (Fig. 1). 1 <0.001 Plant height 28.3 We further examined whether decreased larval oc1 0.027 4.92 Leaf number was a consequence of lower relative ovipocurrence Observationalsite 2 L. trilinea and P. affinis damaged plants rather on sition 2 <0.001 Initial damager 23.8 7 4 0.78 Week than lasting effects of initial treatment. Counts of lar14 0.12 20.2 Initial damagerx Week vae in the week when they were maximally abundant b) Plagiometrionaclavata eggs in 2002 were analyzed using Poisson regression, with Manipulativeexperiment2002 egg number from the last week of oviposition as an 5 0.004 17.4 Treatment additional covariate. The 2-3 weeks between final ovi2 <0.001 64.8 Week 10 0.59 8.9 Treatmentx Week position date and maximal larval abundance is long 1 <0.001 14.9 Percentagedamage enough for all P. clavata eggs to have hatched, yet too Observationalsite 1 soon for pupation to have occurred. Egg number sig3 0.034 8.7 Initial damager nificantly influenced larval occurrence, with initial 1 <0.001 11 Week treatment remaining marginally significant (Table 2). 3 1.1 0.78 Initial damagerx Week 1 In 2002, similar effects of treatment on the occurrence 0.02 5.4 Percentagedamage of P. clavata pupae (X2 = 30.2, df = 5, P < 0.001) Observationalsite 2 2 <0.001 14.4 Initial damager and exuviae (X2 = 32.6, df = 5, P < 0.001) were 5 <0.001 69.1 Week entirely driven by lower occurrences in previous life 8 0.013 19.4 Initial damagerx Week stages (Table 2). Hence, adult P. clavata oviposition 1 0.006 7.5 Plant height determined occurrence in all other life stagpreference Notes: In manipulativeexperiments,total percentagedamexuviae were too few to perform Poisson and es. Pupae age in the week previousto each samplingintervaland plant in 2001. as week were used in current and leaf number the regressions height covariates. Percentageof leaf area consumedon each plant Observational study by initial herbivoreswas used as an additionalcovariatein the observationalstudy.Covariatesnot significantat an alpha At site 1, damage levels on the initial sampling date value of 0.05 were removed from the analysis and are not 0% to 15%, with P. affinis and Prophysaon from reported. ranged sp. as the main initial damagers (plants damaged by both species are not included in this study). Both of years: P. affinis damage and jasmonic acid decreased these herbivores were subsequently found at extremely the odds of P. affinis occurrence relative to undamaged low frequencies, while later arriving P. clavata were controls by >50% and 75%, respectively, whereas Pla- more abundant. Initial damage type significantly afgiometriona clavata damage increased the odds of P. fected the number of P. clavata eggs (Table 1), with affinis occurrence by >50% relative to controls, al- the odds of oviposition being 47% lower on plants though this comparison was not statistically significant damaged by P. affinis relative to plants that were iniin 2001 (Fig. 1; see the Appendix for raw means). tially undamaged. However, no such influence of ProConversely, Aphrophora saratogensis, Prophysaon sp., physaon damage was apparent (Fig. 2a; see the Apor mechanical damage did not influence P. affinis oc- pendix for raw means). Significant overall effects of currence (Fig. 1). Effects of initial treatment were not early-season damager on the occurrence of larvae (X2 = 3, P = 0.02; see Fig. 3), pupae (X2 = significant in subsequent weeks, despite the continued = 9.57, df 16.2, df = 3, P = 0.001), and exuviae (X2 = 17.1, df presence of P. affinis adults throughout each season. A similar consistency was apparent across years for = 3, P < 0.001) were due to the previous distribution P. clavata. Although adult occurrence was not influ- of eggs (Table 2). Adult P. clavata occurred at too low a frequency to allow Poisson regression. enced by initial treatment (for 2001, x2 = 12.1, df =7, At site 2, damage levels on the initial sampling date P = 0.10; for 2002, X2 = 2.7, df = 5, P = 0.75), Poisson regressions revealed significant effects on other life also ranged from 0% to 15%, with P. clavata and P. SPECIFICITYOF PLANT RESPONSES April 2005 891 2.5 a) 2001 O Plagiometriona clavata larvae A Psylliodesaffinis n Z.u 1.5 0 1.0 0 () 0.5 * *A 0 C U Mechanical Aphrophora Psylliodes PlagiometrionaPryphasaon affinis clavata sp. damage saratogensis Lema trilinea Jasmonic acid () 0 D .0 2.5 1) 03 -0 0 * Plagiometriona clavata eggs clavata larvae ? Plaaiometriona A Psylliodesaffinis b) 2002 2.0- 1.5 ................ 1.0- .... ..... . ........ .... ............. 0.5 *9 *A A u Psylliodes PlagionmetionaPryphasaon clavata affinis sp. Lema trilinea Jasmonic acid FIG. 1. Results from repeated-measures Poisson regression showing relative odds of herbivore occurrence on Solanum dulcamara plants following several different early-season manipulations in 2001 and 2002, calculated relative to undamaged controls (dotted line). Psylliodes affinis data are from week 2 only. Symbols and bars show the mean + 1 SE for each treatment. Values above and below 1 indicate greater and lesser odds, respectively, of herbivore occurrence when compared to the control. An asterisk indicates a significant difference at an alpha value of 0.05. Note that odds of occurrence for Plagiometriona clavata larvae in panel (b) result from a similar distribution of P. clavata eggs, with continuing effects on P. clavata pupation and eclosion (see Results). For treatment details, see Methods: Manipulative experiments. affinis as the main initial damagers. Subsequently, these same two species were the main colonizers. Initial damage type significantly affected colonization by P. affinis (Table 1), with 60% lower odds of occurrence on plants receiving conspecific herbivory relative to plants that were initially undamaged (Fig. 2b; see the Appendix for raw means). There was no such effect of P. clavata herbivory (Fig. 2b). P. clavata oviposition was also significantly influenced by initial damage type (Table 1), with 27% lower odds of oviposition on P. affinis damaged plants relative to controls. However, there was no influence of P. clavata herbivory on oviposition by conspecifics (Fig. 2b). Similarly, significant effects of initial damage type on larvae (X2 = 15.5, df = 2, P < 0.001; see Fig. 2b), pupae (X2 = 9.01, df = 2, P = 0.011), and exuviae (X2 = 15.4, df = 2, P < 0.001) were again due to the previous distribution of eggs (Table 2). The occurrence of P. clavata adults was not affected by differences in early-season attacker (X2 = 1.7, df = 2, P = 0.43). Direct vs. indirect effects For the results just reported, significant effects of initial damage type on herbivore occurrence were never eliminated when damage estimates from the previous week were included in Poisson regressions. Nevertheless, percentage damage was a significant covariate in one-third of the analyses, whereas plant height and number of leaves only occasionally influenced foraging herbivores (Tables 1 and 2). Percentage damage by initial herbivores never significantly affected later herbivore occurrence in the observational study (Tables 1 892 TABLE2. DANUSH V. VISWANATHANET AL. Ecology,Vol. 86, No. 4 Results from Poisson regressionsexaminingthe ber of eggs between damaged and control plants (F265 occurrenceof Plagiometrionaclavata larvae, pupae, and = P = 0.016), with P. clavata females strongly 4.44, exuviae on Solanumdulcamaraplants following different early-seasondamagetypes. disfavouring plants damaged by P. affinis (Fig. 3b). No effect of trial was apparent (F, < 0.001, P = 0.99), Effect df P X2 nor was there a trial x treatment interaction (F2,65 = Larvae 0.52, P = 0.598). a) Manipulativeexperiment2002 Treatment 11 5 0.052 DISCUSSION 183.9 1 <0.001 Egg number 5.7 1 0.017 Percentagedamage Experimental demonstrations of induced plant reObservationalsite 1 sponses influencing herbivore success are one of the Initial damager 3.7 3 0.3 main reasons for renewed interest in competition be126.1 1 <0.001 Egg number tween insects (Denno et al. 1995). A number of field Observationalsite 2 studies examining plant-mediated competition have, in Initial damager 2 1.9 0.39 shown that early-season herbivory can decrease number fact, 97.1 1 <0.001 Egg the size of subsequent colonizing species, population b) Pupae including phytophagous mites (English-Loeb et al. Manipulativeexperiment2002 Treatment 9.1 5 0.11 1993), microlepidoptera (Karban 1993), and sap-feedLarvalnumber 414.5 1 <0.001 ing planthoppers (Denno et al. 2000). In this study, we Observationalsite 1 similarly show strong influences of early-season inInitial damager 3.7 3 0.29 duction on occurrence across herbivore generations. In Larval number 21 1 <0.001 both experimental and natural patterns indiaddition, Observationalsite 2 cate that such lasting effects of initial herbivory may Initial damager 1.9 2 0.39 Larvalnumber 97.1 1 <0.001 depend on the order of herbivore arrival when plants exhibit specificity in the elicitation of induced plant Exuviae c) responses. Manipulativeexperiment2002 Treatment 8.9 5 0.11 Across both manipulative and observational exper479.2 1 <0.001 Pupal number iments, heterospecific herbivory by P. affinis consisObservationalsite 1 tently decreased P. clavata oviposition when compared Initial damager 5 3 0.17 to plants that initially received no damage. Decreased 46.5 1 <0.001 Pupal number 6.8 1 0.009 Percentagedamage egg number resulted in decreased occurrence of larvae and pupae, with subsequently fewer second-generation Observationalsite 2 Initial damager 4.5 2 0.1 adults emerging on P. affinis damaged plants. The same 44.2 1 <0.001 Pupal number effect was observed following L. trilinea damage in Notes: Analyses were performedon data from the week the manipulative experiments, whereas conspecific herwhen each life stage was maximallyabundant,with numbers never influenced P. clavata occurrence. Interfrom the final week of the previouslife stage as a covariate. bivory In manipulativeexperiments,total percentagedamagein the estingly, adult P. clavata occurrence was never affected week previousto the samplingintervaland plant height and by the identity of early-season attackers, suggesting leaf numberin the currentweek were also used as covariates. that adults forage independently of initial damage type, Percentageof leaf area consumed on each plant by initial but nevertheless assess host plant quality when making herbivoreswas used as an additionalcovariatein the observational study. Covariatesnot significantat an alpha value oviposition decisions. of 0.05 were removedfrom the analysisand are not reported. Early-season damage by conspecifics consistently decreased P. affinis occurrence relative to plants that initially received no herbivory. However, heterospeand 2), whereas in the manipulative experiments, her- cific damage did not have a similar effect. In the mabivore occurrence was never different between me- nipulative experiments, only P. affinis herbivory had chanically damaged plants and undamaged controls negative effects on conspecifics 1-2 weeks after initial (Fig. 1). damage (with weak evidence for a short-term positive effect of P. clavata herbivory on P. affinis occurrence). Preference tests At site 2 of the observational study, negative effects In the no-choice assay, P. affinis feeding rate was of conspecific damage on P. affinis lasted the entire season (with neither short- nor long-term effects of P. significantly affected by initial damage type (F339 = 4.64, P = 0.007), with 47% less tissue consumed on clavata herbivory). Because the length of the sampling plants damaged by conspecifics relative to controls interval exceeded the recorded generation time for this (Fig. 3a). A similar reduction did not occur following species by several weeks (Wheeler and Hoebeke 1983), P. clavata or L. trilinea herbivory (Fig. 3a). In the P. P. affinis adults at the end of the season most likely clavata oviposition choice assay, there was a significant included progeny of early-season colonizers. Hence, effect of initial damage type on the difference in num- effects of initial P. affinis herbivory on conspecifics SPECIFICITYOF PLANT RESPONSES April 2005 893 I 1.0 a) Site 1 0.8 -- 0.6 0 c o 0 0 0.4 cavata Plagiometriona a) 0? 0.2 Plagiometrionaclavata clavata larvae larvae Plagiometriona (a) I Psylliodes affinis (D 0 a) o > Prophysaon sp. 1.6 1.4 b) Site 2 ._ ) 1.2 U) 1.0 .. .... .... ............... ........................... . ............................. v 0 0.8 0.6 0.4 ~* Ay/2\ 0.2 Psylliodes affinis * Plagiometrionaclavata eggs 0 Plagiometrionaclavata larvae A Psylliodes affinis Plagiometrionaclavata FIG. 2. Results from repeated-measures Poisson regression showing relative odds of herbivore occurrence on Solanum dulcamara plants following natural early-season damage by different herbivore species at site 1 and site 2, calculated relative to plantsthat initially received no herbivory(dotted line). Symbols and bars show the mean + 1 SE for each damagetype. Valuesabove and below 1 indicategreaterand lesser odds, respectively,of herbivoreoccurrencewhen comparedto initially undamagedplants. An asteriskindicates a significantdifferenceat an alpha value of 0.05. Note that odds of occurrencefor P. clavata larvae result from a similar distributionof P. clavata eggs, with continuingeffects on P. clavata pupationand eclosion (see Results).For treatmentdetails, see Methods:Observationalstudy. may have persisted across generations in the observational study. Several lines of evidence together suggest that specificity in the elicitation of induced plant responses caused the divergent herbivore occurrence patterns observed in the field. Most importantly, findings from the preference assays match those from field experiments. P. affinis had lower feeding rates on undamaged tissue from conspecifically, but not heterospecifically, damaged plants when compared to controls. P. clavata females also showed a relative oviposition bias against undamaged tissue from P. affinis damaged plants, although the expected bias against L. trilinea damaged plants was not found. Secondly, herbivore occurrence never differed between mechanically damaged plants and undamaged controls, indicating that removal of tissue in the absence of herbivore-specific induction cues did not influence plant quality for subsequent foragers. Finally, treatment with jasmonic acid consistently lowered the occurrence of P. affinis, showing that induction in the absence of any external cues left by herbivores is sufficient to cause changes in the suitability of S. dulcamara. The pattern of induced resistance in this study may have resulted from specific changes in the quality of plant tissues (Stout et al. 1994, 1998). In addition, specific induction of volatile compounds may have influenced either host use by herbivores (e.g., Pallini et al. 1997) or the attraction of predators and parasitoids (e.g., De Moraes et al. 1998, Meiners et al. 2000). Preliminary analysis of tissue collected from the manipulative experiments following initial damage has shown that P. affinis did, in fact, induce qualitatively different chemical responses in S. dulcamara leaves than did P. clavata (D. V. Viswanathan, O. A. Lifchits, and J. S. Thaler, unpublished data). The responses induced by P. clavata seemed simply not to have influenced later colonizers. Although it is possible that herbivory by subsequent attackers further altered the strength or quality of initial plant responses, the sim- DANUSH V. VISWANATHANET AL. 894 Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 4 50 cm E E 4a) 1 0a) 300) a) 25 0c 0) -J ab * * 35- b 2015 10 Control Psylliodes Plagiometriona clavata affinis Lema trilinea t0 ) C 0) 4 2 E I o CO-2 a) c -4 C 0) -6 0) -8 ]Q FIG. 3. Psylliodes affinis Plagiometriona clavata Lema trilinea (a) Amount of Solanum dulcamara leaf area consumed by a single Psylliodes affinis adult over two days of feeding on systemic tissue producedfollowing one of four initial treatmentsin a no-choice feeding experiment.(b) Differencein the numberof eggs laid by single gravidPlagiometrionaclavata females over four days between pairs of damagedand control Solanumdulcamaraplants.Damagewas imposedusing one of threedifferentherbivorespecies, andovipositionwas restricted to tissue producedafter the damagingphase. In both panels (a) and (b), boxes and bars show the mean + 1 SE for each treatment.Treatmentsthat do not share a common letter above boxes are significantlydifferentat an alpha value of 0.05, calculatedwith Tukey'spost hoc comparisonsfollowing ANOVA. For treatmentdetails, see Methods:Preferencetests. ilarity of results between preference tests and field experiments suggests that responses to initial damagers were, by themselves, sufficient to determine host plant quality. Specificity in induced responses produced lasting differences in herbivore occurrence in the field, but whether this stemmed from equivalently long-term alterations in plant phenotype was not always clear. Despite an early-season difference between treatments in oviposition quality for P. clavata, subsequent effects of initial damage type on the relative survival of larvae and pupae were not apparent. Although these results might suggest a mid-season diminution in the strength of induced responses or lowered sensitivity of later life stages, several unmeasured life-history characteristics could have in fact been influenced by damage type, including time to pupation, pupal mass, or emergence. Conversely, results for P. affinis occurrence were more conclusive, although slightly inconsistent: definite season-long effects in the observational study contrasted with solely short-term effects in both manipulative experiments. This difference may have been caused by transplantation shock preventing the induction of strong responses with lasting effects in the manipulative experiments. Additionally, relatively close spacing of individuals in manipulative experiments may have promoted competition as plants grew, which can attenuate the expression of plant responses (Cipollini and Bergelson 2001). Because induced plant responses are a product of the interaction between plant and herbivore, it is not clear from the current data whether the observed pattern of specificity is adaptive for either S. dulcamara or its attackers. Alternatively, it may be solely a functional April2005 SPECIFICITYOF PLANT RESPONSES consequence of different herbivore feeding styles or salivary elicitors. Whether or not there is a clear adaptive explanation, however, plant-mediated interactions on S. dulcamara took place largely between its most abundant colonizers, P. affinis and P. clavata. These effects were unidirectional: P. affinis feeding had negative effects on both P. clavata and conspecifics, whereas P. clavata damage did not influence either itself or P. affinis. This result is not unusual; interactions between insects are often asymmetric, particularly among mandibulate herbivores (Denno et al. 1995). However, asymmetric competition between herbivores caused by specificity in the elicitation of induced plant responses is a novel possibility in the study of plantinsect interactions. Similar specificity in prey responses to multiple predator species has recently received much experimental attention from behavioral and evolutionary ecologists (Sih et al. 1998, Relyea 2003), following earlier theoretical work showing that trade-offs among predator-specific defenses in prey can promote the coexistence of different predator species (Matsuda et al. 1993) and overall community complexity (Matsuda et al. 1994). Hence, our results (and similar findings by Van Zandt and Agrawal 2004) suggest that comparable attention to specificity in induced plant responses may provide related insights into the dynamics of herbivorous insect communities. In sum, there was a strong similarity of results across experiments in this study. Manipulative experiments indicated that initial damage type could affect herbivore occurrence in the field, and observational studies verified that herbivore distribution in natural populations of S. dulcamara is indeed influenced by the order of arrival of herbivore species. Subsequent preference tests showed that specificity in induced plant responses underlay these patterns. Overall, we therefore found evidence for specificity in the elicitation of induced plant responses that was consistent across time and space, with lasting effects on herbivores. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 895 wild radish. Annals of the Entomological Society of Amer- ica 94:71-75. Allison, P. D. 1999. Logistic regressionusing the SAS system: theory and application. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina,USA. Bronner,R., E. Westphal,and E Dreger. 1991a. Enhanced peroxidase activity associated with the hypersensitive response of Solanum dulcamara to the gall mite Aceria cla- dophthirus(Acaria, Eriophyoidea).CanadianJournal of Botany 69:2192-2196. Bronner,R., E. Westphal,andF Dreger.1991b. Pathogenesisrelated proteins in SolanumdulcamaraL resistantto the gall mite Aceria cladophthirus (Acaria, Eriophyoidea). Physiological and MolecularPlant Pathology38:93-104. Cipollini, D. E, and J. Bergelson. 2001. Plant density and nutrient availability constrain constitutive and wound-induced expression of trypsin inhibitors in Brassica napus. Journalof ChemicalEcology 27:593-610. De Moraes, C. M., W. J. Lewis, P. W. Pare, H. T. Albron, and J. H. Tumlinson. 1998. Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393:570-573. Denno, R. F, M. S. McClure, and J. R. Ott. 1995. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition reex- aminedandresurrected.AnnualReview of Entomology40: 297-331. Denno, R. F, M. A. Peterson, C. Gratton, J. Cheng, G. A. Langellotto,A. F Huberty,andD. L. Finke.2000. Feeding inducedchangesin plantqualitymediateinterspecificcompetition between sap-feeding insects. Ecology 81:18141827. English-Loeb,G. M., R. Karban,and D. Hougen-Eitzman. 1993. Directandindirectcompetitionbetweenspidermites feeding on grapes. Ecological Applications 3:699-707. Faeth, S. H. 1986. Indirectinteractionsbetween temporally separated herbivores mediated by the host plant. Ecology 67:479-494. Gonzalez-Megias, A., and J. M. Gomez. 2003. Consequences of removing a keystone herbivore for the abundance and diversity of arthropods associated with a cruciferous shrub. Ecological Entomology 28:299-308. Hanhimaki,S. 1989. Inducedresistancein mountainbirch: defence against leaf-chewing insect guild and herbivore competition.Oecologia 81:242-248. Hartley, S. E., and J. H. Lawton. 1987. Effects of different types of damage on the chemistry of birch foliage, and the responses of birch feeding insects. Oecologia 74:432-437. Haukioja, E., and P. Niemela. 1979. Birch leaves as a resource for herbivores: seasonal occurrence of increased resistance in foliage after mechanical damage of adjacent leaves. Oecologia 39:151-159. Hunter, M. D. 1987. Opposing effects of spring defoliation on late-season oak caterpillars. Ecological Entomology 12: 373-382. WethankJenniferChalmers,GrahamCox, AbbyDeshman, Joey Dodgson,Celine Griffin,Ray Holberger,Lisa Plane,and Pete Van Zandt for help with field work, AnuragAgrawal, Peter Abrams,Don Jackson,and Pete Van Zandtfor developmentof ideas, andA. AgrawalandP.VanZandtfor helpful Inbar,M., H. Doostdar,R. M. Sonoda, G. L. Leibee, and R. T. Mayer.1998. Elicitorsof plantdefensivesystemsreduce commentson the manuscript.This researchwas supportedby insect densities and disease incidence. Journal of Chemical the CanadianFoundationfor Innovationand a NaturalSciences andEngineeringResearchCouncil(NSERC)of Canada Ecology 24:135-149. operating grant to J. S. Thaler, and NSERC graduateand Karban, R. 1993. Induced resistance and plant density of a native shrub, Gossypium thurberi, affect its herbivores. undergraduate scholarshipsto D. V. Viswanathanand A. J. T. Narwani, respectively. LITERATURE CITED Agrawal, A. A. 1999. Induced responses to herbivory in wild radish: effects on several herbivores and plant fitness. Ecology 80:1713-1723. Agrawal, A. A. 2000. Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalistherbivores.Oikos 89:493-500. Agrawal, A. A., and M. F Sherriffs. 2001. Induced plant resistance and susceptibility to late-season herbivores of Ecology 74:1-8. Karban, R., and I. T. Baldwin. 1997. Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Matsuda, H., P. A. Abrams, and M. Hori. 1993. The effects of adaptive anti-predator behavior on exploitative com- petition and mutualismbetween predators.Oikos 68:549- 559. Matsuda, H., M. Hori, and P. A. Abrams. 1994. Effects of predator-specificdefence on communitycomplexity.EvolutionaryEcology 8:628-638. 896 DANUSH V. VISWANATHAN ET AL. Meiners, T., C. Westerhaus, and M. Hilker. 2000. Specificity of chemical cues used by a specialist egg parasitoid during host location. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 95: 151-159. Pallini, A., A. Janssen, and M. W. Sabelis. 1997. Odourmediated responses of phytophagous mites to conspecific and heterospecific competitors. Oecologia 110:179-185. Relyea, R. A. 2003. How prey respond to combined predators: a review and empirical test. Ecology 84:1827-1839. Riihimaki, J., P. Kaitaniemi, and K. Ruohomaki. 2003. Spatial responses of two herbivore groups to a geometrid larva on mountain birch. Oecologia 134:203-209. Sih, A., G. Englund, and D. Wooster. 1998. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:350-355. Stout, M. J., K. V. Workman, R. M. Bostock, and S. S. Duffey. 1998. Specificity of induced resistance in the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Oecologia 113:74-81. Stout, M. J., K. V. Workman, and S. S. Duffey. 1994. Differential induction of tomato foliar proteins by arthropod herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20:2575-2594. Thaler, J. S., M. J. Stout, R. Karban, and S. S. Duffey. 1996. Exogenous jasmonates simulate insect wounding in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in the laboratory and field. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22:1767-1781. Thaler, J. S., M. J. Stout, R. Karban, and S. S. Duffey. 2001. Jasmonate-mediated induced plant resistance affects a community of herbivores. Ecological Entomology 26:312-324. Traw, M. B., and T. E. Dawson. 2002. Differential induction of trichomes by three herbivores of black mustard. Oecologia 131:526-532. Ecology, Vol. 86, No. 4 Trexler, J. C., and J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology 74:1629-1637. Tscharntke, T. 1999. Insects on common reed (Phragmites australis): community structure and the impact of herbivory on shoot growth. Aquatic Botany 64:399-410. Van Zandt, P. A., and A. A. Agrawal. 2004. Community-wide impacts of herbivore- induced plant responses in milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Ecology 85:2616-2629. Viswanathan, D. V., and J. S. Thaler. 2004. Plant vascular architecture and within-plant spatial patterns in resource quality following herbivory. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30:521-533. Westphal, E., E Dreder, and R. Bronner. 1991. Induced resistance in Solanum dulcamara triggered by the gall mite Aceria cladophthirus (Acaria, Eriophyoidea). Experimental and Applied Acarology 12:1.11-118. Westphal, E., M. J. Perrotminnot, S. Kreiter, and J. Guitierrez. 1992. Hypersensitive reaction of Solanum dulcamara to the gall mite Aceria cladophthirus causes an increased susceptibility to Tetranvchus urcticae. Experimental and Applied Acarology 15:15-26. Wheeler, A. G., and E. R. Hoebeke. 1983. New records of a palearctic flea beetle, Psylliodes affinis, in eastern North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 85:594-597. Wise, M. J., and A. M. Weinberg. 2002. Prior flea beetle herbivory affects oviposition preference and larval performance of a potato beetle on their shared host plant. Ecological Entomology 27:115-122. APPENDIX A table showing raw means for (A) Psylliodes affinis adult and (B) Plagiomatriona clavata egg abundance on Solanum dulcamara plants following different early-season damage types is available in ESA's Electronic Data Archive: Ecological Archives E086-047-A 1.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz