June 2015 doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00 IEEE 802.15.4q - Conditional Approval to Start Sponsor Ballot Submission Slide 1 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00 802.15.4q Letter Ballot History Initial Ballot closed on 17 October 2014 • Vote results (pool of 102 voters) • 86 responses (84.3 response ratio) • 75 yes, 12 no (85.31 approval ratio) • 6 abstain (6.98% abstain ratio) 301 total comments received, 124 “Must Be Satisfied” (35 accepted, 51 rejected, 38 revised) Submission Slide 2 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00 802.15.4q Ballot History (cont’d) Recirculation Ballot 1 -closed on 10 January, 2015 • Vote results (pool of 102 voters) • • • 91 responses (89.22% response ratio) 72 yes, 13 no (84.71% approval ratio) 6 abstain (6.59% abstain ratio) 120 total comments received, 63 “Must Be Satisfied” (20 accepted, 33 rejected, 10 revised) Submission Slide 3 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00 802.15.4q Ballot History (cont’d) Recirculation Ballot 2 closed on 5 March, 2015 • Vote results (pool of 102 voters) • 94 responses (92.16% response ratio) • 77 yes, 11 no (87.5% approval ratio) • 6 abstain (6.38% abstain ratio) 217 total comments received, 158 “Must Be Satisfied” (23 accepted, 11 rejected, 124 revised) Submission Slide 4 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00 802.15.4q Ballot History (cont’d) Recirculation Ballot 3 closed on 25 April, 2015 • Vote results (pool of 102 voters) • 94 responses (92.16% response ratio) • 80 yes, 9 no (89.89% approval ratio) • 5 abstain (5.32% abstain ratio) 93 total comments received, 59 “Must Be Satisfied” (17 accepted, 26 rejected, 16 revised) Submission Slide 5 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00 802.15.4q Ballot History (cont’d) Recirculation Ballot 4 closed on 26 May, 2015 • Vote results (pool of 102 voters) • 94 responses (92.16 % response ratio) • 80 yes, 8 no (90.91 % approval ratio) • 6 abstain (6.38 % abstain ratio) 67 total comments received, 58 “Must Be Satisfied” (0 accepted, 58 rejected and/or invalid, 0 revised) Submission Slide 6 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000 802.15.4q Comment from Editorial Coordination Staff • MEC requested • Approved on April 12, 2015 Submission Slide 7 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000 Remaining NO Voter Comment Summary • 288 total “Must Be Satisfied”comments received from the 8 remaining NO voters (includes repeat, duplicate, and invalid votes) – 150 were accepted or revised – 138 were rejected (including repeats and dups) • Excluding repeats (same comment from the same voter), there are 106 unsatisfied comments • Excluding duplicates (same comment from more than on voter), there are 94 unique unsatisfied comments • Of the 94 comments, 10 comments (received on the first 3 ballots), relate to a section (ALN) that was removed on the 4th ballot, reducing the number of active unsatisfied unique comments to 84 • Of the 84 comments, 20 comments received on the last recirculation were invalid (comments on text that had not been changed or been affected by a change) reducing the total number of valid active unsatisfied unique comments to 64 • • The138 unsatisfied comments and resolutions (including repeats, dups, and invalids) have been copied to doc (15-15-045702-004q-p802-15-4q-remaining-no-voters-unsatisifed-comments-upto-lb107.xlsx) for easy reference with filters The full Consolidated Comment Resolution Spreadsheet for all ballots can be found at: – 15-15-0455-00-004q-p802-15-4q-aggregated-comment-resolution-up-to-lb107.xlsx Submission Slide 8 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000 Comment Summary by Ballot by No Voter 1 2 3 4 5 Total with dups & repeats 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 3 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 Ballot Number No Voter Benjamin A. Rolfe Assyncronous Link Networking (ALN) Editorial PHY Header (PHR) Billy Verso 1 1 1 0 PAR and 5C James Gilb ALN Editorial FEC Frame Format Naming of ULP PHYs PAR and 5C satisfaction PHR Rate Switch RF Sync Transmit HeaderPower (SHR) Control (TPC) 3 0 16 13 6 2 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 65 65 59 42 2 1 1 2 31 1 1 2 6 35 4 4 10 6 31 2 3 2 6 31 2 3 2 0 31 2 3 2 0 26 1 2 2 2 2 2 6 1 5 1 6 2 6 1 5 1 6 2 6 1 5 1 6 2 1 1 0 1 6 1 1 10 7 2 5 2 8 6 3 9 9 8 8 5 1 2 1 5 1 2 1 5 1 2 1 5 1 2 0 5 1 2 0 5 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 Michael Lynch Editorial PAR and 5C TPC FEC PAR and 5C satisfaction 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Tero Kivinen 9 ALN Editorial Information Element TPC Grand Total Submission 2 6 1 5 5 Michael McLaughlin Total minus invalids 93 1 4 Total minus inactive 50 Editorial FEC RF TPC PAR and 5C 0 Total minus dups 8 Jeritt Kent Steve JILLINGS 0 3 Total minus repeats 8 5 22 18 16 13 13 7 1 3 1 1 3 10 3 6 3 7 3 5 3 5 3 5 0 5 3 5 0 5 3 5 26 58 138 106 94 84 64 3 2 4 20 28 6 Slide 9 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000 Unsatisfied Comment Summary by Category Comment Category ALN Editorial FEC Frame Format Information Element Naming of ULP PHYs PAR and 5C satisfaction PHR Rate Switch RF SHR TPC Totals Ballot Number: 1 2 3 6 4 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 7 2 3 1 2 2 4 5 5 (valid only) 13 1 1 34 2 1 1 2 2 6 1 7 29 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 2 58 2 38 2 4 1 4 20 1 6 28 1 6 4 26 Total (all) Total (unique/valid) 10 10 52 38 6 1 4 2 3 3 10 2 18 3 8 2 2 1 7 0 2 1 16 11 138 74 The138 unsatisfied comments and resolutions (including repeats, dups, and invalids) have been copied to doc (15-15-0457-02-004q-p802-15-4q-remaining-no-voters-unsatisifed-comments-upto-lb107.xlsx) for easy reference with filters . Submission Slide 10 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000 Recirc 4 (LB107) Drill Down • Currently there are 8 outstanding NO Voters • 5 of the outstanding 8 NO Voters did not respond to Recirc4 – Of those 5, 4 have not responded since Recirc2. • On Recirc4, there were 37 valid comments received and of those: – 29 were editorial with the proposed resolution being to defer action until Sponsor Ballot – 8 were in the more technical categories and of those” • 7 were repeat comments from earlier rounds • 1 was new where the commentor had changed his mind on what he had asked for on the last recirc. • Bottom line: we are not seeing substantive new comments and need to move this along. • Next Steps– Make no further changes to the draft, ensure all unsatisfied comments/resolutions have been recirculated and move to Sponsor Ballot Submission Slide 11 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000 802.15.4q Balloting & Meeting Schedule • 6th recirculation – 17 June 2015 to 2 July 2015 • BRC comment resolution teleconference – 3 July 2015 Submission Slide 12 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance June 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000 802.15.4q EC motion 802.15 requests the EC to authorize conditional approval to submit 802.15.4q draft D5.0 or current revision to Sponsor Ballot. (WG 29/7/2) – Moved: Heile – Seconded: Mody – Yes: , No: , Abstain: Submission Slide 13 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz