12TH REHVA WORLD CONGRESS, CLIMA 2016 Investigation of Demand Response Strategies in a Mixed-Used Building Despoina Christantonia, Simeon Oxizidisb, Damian Flynna, Donal Finna aUniversity College Dublin, Ireland bTyndall National Institute, Cork, Republic of Ireland Despoina Christantoni is funded under Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions and co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). Investing in Your Future Outline Context Building Energy Simulation Model DR Strategy Results Conclusions Background Reference: Sonja van Renssen, Nature Climate Change Building Energy Simulation Model • 11,100 m2 floor area • Key Features: Offices, Retail Fitness Centre 50 m Swimming Pool Cinema / Theatre UCD Sports Centre Debating Chamber Meeting Rooms Building Energy Simulation Model BEMS data archived at 15 minute intervals: Electricity and gas consumption Zonal parameters Electricity: MBE: -1.6% & CVRMSE: 10.5% EnergyPlus model (Reference: D. Christantoni, S. Oxizidis, D. Flynn, D. P. Finn, Calibration of a commercial building energy simulation model for demand response analysis, in: Proceedings of BS2015: 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2015, pp. 2865–2872.) Building Energy Simulation Model DR Case Study Pre-cooling and set-point relaxation for a summer weekday 3 different start times 2oC decrease during the pre-cooling period (2 or 4 hours) Increase of temperature during the event following ASHRAE limits for acceptable drifts (2 or 4 hours) Time Period Maximum Operative Temperature Change (oC) (09:00, 12:00, 14:00) 0.25 h 0.5 h 1h 2h 4h 1.1 1.7 2.2 2.8 3.3 ASHRAE Standard 55-2004, Thermal Environment Conditions for Human Occupancy Building Demand with no DR measures Electric Power Demand (kW) Outdoor temperature 24 500 20 400 16 300 12 200 8 100 4 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time (Hour) 14 16 18 20 22 24 Temperature (oC) Electric Power Demand 600 DR event at 09:00 Pre-cool 07:00 to 09:00 Pre-cool 05:00 to 09:00 Pre-cool 07:00 to 09:00 Pre-cool 05:00 to 09:00 30 Electric Power Demand (kW) 20 10 0 3 5 7 9 11 13 3 5 7 9 11 13 -10 -20 -30 Time (Hour) (a) from 09:00 to 11:00 (b) from 09:00 to 13:00 DR events at 12:00 Pre-cool 10:00 to 12:00 Pre-cool 08:00 to 12:00 Pre-cool 10:00 to 12:00 Pre-cool 08:00 to 12:00 Electric Power Demand (kW) 10 5 0 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 6 8 10 12 14 16 -5 -10 Time (Hour) -15 (a) from 12:00 to 14:00 (a) from 12:00 to 16:00 18 20 DR event at 16:00 Pre-cool 12:00 to 14:00 Pre-cool 12:00 to 16:00 Pre-cool 12:00 to 14:00 Pre-cool 12:00 to 16:00 10 Electric Power Demand (kW) 5 0 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 Time (Hour) (a) from 16:00 to 18:00 (a) from 16:00 to 20:00 Comparison Pre-cooling duration Event duration 2 DR start time 2 4 2 4 4 9 12 16 9 12 16 9 12 16 9 12 16 Electricity Increase Electriciy Reduction Reduction / Increase (kWh) (kWh) Ratio 86.7 112 1.3 52.7 16.6 0.3 14.6 15.1 1 86.7 244.5 2.8 52.7 101.6 1.9 14.6 127.5 8.7 302.1 113.8 0.4 111.4 17.5 0.2 47 15.1 0.3 302.1 246.8 0.8 111.4 103.6 0.9 47 127.9 2.7 Conclusions Maximum electric load reduction of 6.6% Pre-cooling duration does not considerably affect the electric power demand reduction during the event Pre-cooling later in the day results in a lower power demand increase Power demand reduction affected by the time of the event Thank you for your attention! Despoina Christantoni [email protected]
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz