E408S: The structure of 212Po from 8He reactions on 208Pb Phil Walker, University of Surrey photo from Wilton Catford (2004) NIM article 2002 data NB: 3 full-size Clovers + 1 small Clover, not close packed, 2 bad crystals; overall efficiency = 3.4% at 662 keV ~2 days of ~105 /s 8He: 208Pb(8He,4n)212Po singles γ-rays: singles, doubles, triples doubles triples 2004: high-power target tests peak current: 17 μA of 75 MeV/u 13C6+, i.e. 2.8 kW ~8x105 s-1 8He average over 5 days ~2x105 s-1 8He 2004 data article JPG NB: 4 full-size Clovers, close packed, overall efficiency = 13.5% at 662 keV ~4 days of ~2x105 /s 8He: 208Pb(8He,4n)212Po improvement for γ-γ: 2x2х(13.5/3.4)2 = 60 1 st 1 and nd 2 223 keV gate 2002 data 223 keV gate 2 2004 data Garnsworthy et al., J. Phys. G31 (2005) s1851 212Po adding to: Poletti et al., Nucl. Phys. A473 (1987) 595 212Po levels partial scheme 868 keV gate 981 He singles 8 singles 223 212Po 405 Energy beam detector problems: (i) too much beam scattering (ii) too low efficiency beamline 2.5m target beam detector ~35μg/cm2 singles time spectra time spectra without T ref with Tref ~40 ns Outcomes: 1. New transitions assigned to 212Po. 2. Beam timing not yet realised. “the day will come when thou shalt see with thine own eyes what an honourable thing it is to wander in the pursuit of this calling” Don Quixote, Cervantes, 1605 cleaning up heavy-ion,xn spectra thick target: no charged-particle reaction products 90 ns between beam pulses (cf. ~20 ns time resolution) 10 μs between beam particles, for 105 8He per second beam-particle detection is needed (or neutrons)
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz